I don't concur that it is a better camera than the F5 in case you wondered. But for my own stuff and my own preference the F6 is a screamer of a camera, about the size of the F100, but significantly heavier. but at the time I needed digital for some client shoots. in retrospect I think I might have preferred the F6. when I purchased the D200, I almost bought the F6 because it felt so good and was more responsive. I have a D200 also, but well the D200 is digital and built to a lesser standard than the F6 and F5. I did play with it and it is a remarkable camera. It should last for many, many years, and I suspect that color film willīe around for many years, too (not to mention B&W). But I'm sure you will enjoy your F6 very much. If you're having second thoughts, you may wish to call B&H photo and see if you can get a refund, or a credit towards theĭ700. Images, because you must store, read, and write back again to memory on some kind of schedule in order for the errorĬorrection codes to correct errors that may occur over time. I'm sure you know that.anybody who buys an F6 knows about film. I know, because I got great scans from Kodachrome that And Kodachrome will last more than 50 years. For archival purposes, as long as you safely store your negatives you should be able to retrieve images forĭecades to come. I know you might be having second thoughts now that
With Kodak Portra NC or VC, you will get images of very high quality. Buy the Nikon 35 mm film scanner, and SilverFast, and
0 kommentar(er)
